The Program serves residents that generate RCRA (the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, that governs hazardous waste) categorically exempt household hazardous waste, and businesses that generate RCRA conditionally exempt small quantities of hazardous waste. This work is required under Washington State law (RCW 70.105.220); and is locally enabled in King County Board of Health code (KCBOH 2.08) and undertaken through a Program Plan that was approved by the King County Board of Health and the Washington State Department of Ecology. We accomplish this work by providing:
| ⇛ Collection & Disposal services, such as:
|
⇛ Use & Storage information
& technical assistance about toxic products and safer alternatives for:
|
⇛ Prevention/Upstream work to:
|
The Program is currently funded 95% by user fee surcharges. Those surcharges are drawn 19% from sewer ratepayers, 60% from solid waste ratepayers, and 16% from transfer station/landfill users. The remaining 5% is drawn from state grants. We monitor those revenues from business and households, and our expenditures, so that businesses and institutions pay for business services, and households pay for household services.
The Management Coordination Committee (the Program’s governing board) determined that the Program needed to increase its rates in 2012 just to maintain services at their current levels. The Program’s previous rate increase was in 2006 - which will be a six-year span between rate adjustments. The King County Board of Heath sets the Program’s fee rates. After raising those rates in 2006, the Board of Health instructed Program staff to update them every 3-5 years on the Program’s financial status. Program staff reported to the Board in past years that rate increases could be deferred in 2009 and 2010, and again in 2011 as the economy worsened. That was possible through attrition, targeted under-spending, finding new efficiencies, and not expanding Program services beyond what could be accommodated with existing resources and through internal re-prioritization of work. However, those measures were exhausted, and if a rate increase had not been approved, dramatic cuts in services to residential and business ratepayers, and the public, would be the result.
The Program’s fund would be exhausted in 2012 without a fee rate increase or significant cuts in services. The table below shows projected revenues and expenses, and the difference between the two without an increase.
Amounts |
Notes |
+$36.6M |
Projected revenues, from 2012 through 2014, at 2006/current fee rate levels (without a fee rate increase). |
-$48.5M |
Projected expenses, from 2012 through 2014, which will maintain services at 2011 levels. |
-$12.1M |
Gap between revenues without a fee rate increase, and expenses. (Amount that would be generated by the originally proposed fee rate increase.) |
This section shows the revenue that will be generated by the approved Board of Health increase and the remaining shortfall that will be have to be absorbed by the Program.
$11.1M |
Amount that will be generated by the 2012 fee rate increase approved by the Board of Health (slightly less than was originally proposed). |
-$1M |
Remaining shortfall to be absorbed by the Program over the 3-year rate period. |
Two sets of factors drove this rate proposal. They include declines in revenues and projected increases in expenses.
The revenue side of the gap involves declines in transfer station visits and tonnage disposed of, and the amount of sewage treated. On the expenses side of the issue, the most significant Program costs are labor-related and Program partner agencies’ overhead charges. Most of these cost increases are structural in nature, and essentially outside of the Program’s control.
These factors, reduced revenues in the past, flat revenues projected in the future, and increasing structural costs in the next few years, along with our active work to live within our means and delay a rate increase in 2009, 2010 and 2011, propelled the need for a rate increase in 2012.
If no rate increase had been approved, cuts in the following areas would have been made:
The Board of Health formed a sub-committee in December 2010 and deliberated the Program's proposal for a fee rate increase through February 2011. Based on the desire to maintain the current levels of service, to the extent possible, they approved the fees at the requested amounts with one exception. That exception was a slightly lower business solid waste rate increase than was originally requested.
The following table shows the rates set in 2006 and the NEW rates beginning in 2012.
Program Revenue Sources |
Rates Set in 2006 |
Amount of Increase |
New 2012 Rates |
| Solid Waste | |||
| Residential Accounts | $0.80/month |
$0.28/month |
$1.08/month |
| Business/Institutional Accounts | $9.07/month |
$2.17/month |
$11.24/month |
| Transfer Station – Private Vehicles | $1.34/trip |
$0.47/trip |
$1.81/trip |
| Transfer Station – Commercial Vehicles | $3.50/ton |
$1.23/ton |
$4.73/ton |
| Sewer | |||
| Charge per million gallons treated | $33.92/M gal. |
$11.87/M gal. |
$45.79/M gal. |
| Estimated Residential Customer Equivalent (RCE) |
$0.19/month |
$0.07/month |
$0.26/month |
Program staff made presentations to, and took input from, a variety of implementing agencies and others, including: